powered by blosxom and Amo, Amas, Amat and Moreprohibitive!


nosce te ipsum [translation]

We stopped in the bookshop to ask for directions to the nearest Mexican food, but I'd ended up buying something, mainly because I feel bad getting good directions without buying something.

While I'm standing there waiting for my purchase to be rung up, I noticed a Booksense poster on the wall. I've since found this article detailing the campaign behind the poster (you can see the PDF version of the poster on the same site here).

Though I'm certainly partial to independent booksellers, I found the misleading errors in the poster to be rather distressing. The poster contrasts California "independent" booksellers with Amazon.com on four numerically-measured points:

  • In-store author appearances
  • Local charity donations
  • Local people employed
  • Sales taxes collected
The most egregious error is the number of local people employed—the poster apparently came out in late 2004, when Amazon.com was already employing several dozen people in the San Francisco Bay Area (perhaps the figure on the poster is rounded to the nearest thousand?). Sales taxes is also misleading—though Amazon.com has a more limited customer base for which it must collect sales taxes, it does collect for all shipments within Washington state (and perhaps other jurisdictions I'm not aware of). Since very few independent booksellers ever charge sales tax when shipping outside of their home state, that bullet point is rather spurious.

Charity donations was a mostly valid point in 2004, but considering the millions that Amazon.com has collected for the American Red Cross and other charities, I'm not sure it's a relevant comparison, either. Now that the winners of the Amazon.com Nonprofit Innovation Award have been announced, this bulletpoint is even more irrelevant.

Which leaves us with in-store author appearances. This one's hard to counter, actually, aside from original works from popular authors that aren't available anywhere else, the numerous author interviews, and fun little promotions that Amazon.com has run over the years.

The thing that most annoyed me about the poster is that the topic is one that deserves a good thinking-over, and the poster does the subject no justice. Still, I'll give you points for trying, NCIBA.

Last updated by eric Sun Oct 16 11:27 2005 | omission | link


Places to go

+ prohibitive! home

Daily:
+ Most Popular Yahoo News
+ Quicktime Trailers
+ Daily Grist
+ Isotope

Monday:
+ Strong Bad Email
Tuesday:
+ Savage Love
Wednesday:
+ thingpart
Thursday:
+ SFGate Entertainment Picks
+ Bad Gods
Friday:
+ Recent NoCal Quakes
+ Borderlands Books Events
Saturday:
+ SFGate Literary Guide
Sunday:
+ Opus

Sometimes:
+ Penny Arcade

People to see

+ Defective Yeti
+ Some Guy Named Paul
+ Random Jane
+ You Listen to Me, Mr. Kick-Ass
+ Bovine Inversus
+ Exploits in Seattle
+ Greenskin's Grab Bag
+ Jon in Argentina
+ Sedition.com
+ Items of Note
+ Luce Designs
+ Busker
+ Son of Max
+ whatchyou talkin' bout?
+ Science Fiction Conversations
+ Minimari SOS
+ Siffblog
+ Miss Carousel
+ Infohazard Fringe Art & Books
+ Fantastic Planet Books [blog]
+ Prof Mason
+ Open Shutter

Things to do

+ The Daily Score
+ Van Jones
+ Capricious Commuter
+ SFist
+ Cephaloblog
+ Knife's Edge
+ QueryLog
+ No Impact Man
+ Green Wombat
+ Clean PR
+ random fortune

previously on prohibitive!

+ complete 2006 entries
+ complete 2005 entries
+ complete 2004 entries
+ complete 2003 entries
+ MT entries